Proceedings in wrong place, Non-compliance with provisions of Section 164 or Section 281 and Effect of omission to frame, or absence of, or error in, charge are defined under Section 462, 463 and 464 of CRPC 1973. Provisions under these sections are:
Section 462 of CRPC "Proceedings in wrong place"
No finding sentence or order of any Criminal Court shall be set aside merely on the ground that the inquiry, trial or other proceeding in the course of which it was arrived at or passed, took place in a wrong sessions division, district, sub-division or other local area, unless it appears that such error has in fact occasioned a failure of justice.
Section 463 of CRPC "Non-compliance with provisions of Section 164 or Section 281"
(1) If any Court, before which a confession or other
statement of an accused person recorded, or purporting to be
recorded under Section 164 or Section 281, is tendered, or
has been received, in evidence, finds that any of the
provisions of either of such sections have not been complied
with by the Magistrate recording the statement, it may,
notwithstanding anything contained in Section 91 of the
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), take evidence in
regard to such non-compliance, and may, if satisfied that
such non-compliance has not injured the accused in his
defence on the merits and that he duly made the statement
recorded, admit such statement.
(2) The provisions of this section apply to Courts of
appeal, reference and revision.
Section 464 of CRPC "Effect of omission to frame, or absence of, or error in, charge"
(1)No finding sentence or order by a Court of
competent jurisdiction shall be deemed invalid merely on the
ground that no charge was framed or on the ground of any error,
omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder
of charges, unless, in the opinion of the Court of appeal,
confirmation or revision, a failure of Justice has in fact been
occasioned thereby.
(2) If the Court of appeal,
confirmation or revision, is of opinion that a failure of justice has in
fact been occasioned, it may -
(a) in the case of an omission to frame a charge, order that
a charge be framed, and that the trial be recommended from the point immediately after the framing of
the charge;
(b) in the case of an error, omission or irregularity in the
charge, direct a new trial to be had upon a charge framed in whatever manner it thinks fit:
Provided that if the Court is of opinion that the facts of
the case are such that no valid charge could be preferred
against the accused in respect of the facts proved, it shall
quash the conviction
DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY
LIMITATION FOR TAKING COGNIZANCE OF CERTAIN OFFENCES
Section 468, 469, 470, 471, 472 and 473 of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 - What is the limitation period for taking cognizance of offences under CRPC?