Section 89 of Evidence Act "Presumption as to due execution, etc., of documents not produced"
The Court shall presume that every document, called for and not produced after notice to produce, was attested, stamped and executed in the manner required by law.
Section 90 of Evidence Act "Presumption as to documents thirty years old"
Where any document, purporting or proved to be thirty years old, is produced from any custody which the Court in the particular case considers proper the Court may presume that the signature and every other part of such document, which purports to be in the handwriting of any particular person, is in that person s handwriting, and, in the case of document executed or attested, that it was duly executed and attested by the persons by whom it purports to be executed and attested.
Explanation - Documents are said to be in proper custody if they are in the place in which, and under the care of the person with whom, they would naturally be; but no custody is improper if it is proved to have had a legitimate origin, or the circumstances of the particular case are such as to render such an origin, probable.
This explanation applies also to section 81.
Illustrations
(a) A has been in possession of landed property for a long
time. He produces from his custody deeds relating to the
land showing his titles to it. The custody is proper.
(b) A produces deeds relating to landed property of which he
is the mortgagee. The mortgagor is in possession.
(c) A, a connection of B, produces deeds relating to lands
in B's possession, which were deposited with him by B for
safe custody. The custody is proper
Section 90a of Evidence Act "Presumption as to electronic records five year old"
Where any electronic record, purporting or proved to be
five years old, is produced from any custody which the Court
in the particular case considers proper, the Court may
presume that the digital signature which purports to be the
digital signature of any particular was so affixed by him or
any person authorized by him in this behalf.
Explanation.- Electronic records are said to be in proper
custody if they are in the place in which, and under the
care of the person with whom, they naturally be; but no
custody is improper if it is proved to have had a legitimate
origin, or the circumstances of the particular case are such
as to render such an origin probable.
This Explanation applies also to section 81A.]