Section 24 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007: Term of Sentence and Its Effect on Appeal

Section 24 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 explains how the commencement and computation of a sentence are affected when the Armed Forces Tribunal passes a sentence in appeal, when the Supreme Court substitutes another sentence, and when operation of a sentence is stayed pending appeal.

In simple terms: Section 24 fixes the starting point of a sentence, preserves that starting point when the Supreme Court substitutes another sentence unless otherwise directed, and excludes from the sentence period any time during which a person is released because the sentence has been stayed pending appeal.

What does Section 24 of the AFT Act provide?

Section 24 is part of Chapter IV of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. It operates in the context of appeals against court-martial findings and sentences and is linked particularly with Section 15, which deals with the Tribunal's jurisdiction, powers and authority in appeals against court martial.

Text of Section 24 - Term of sentence and its effect on appeal

(1) The term of any sentence passed by the Tribunal under clause (a) of sub-section (6) of section 15 of this Act shall, unless the Tribunal otherwise directs, be reckoned to commence on the day on which it would have commenced under the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), as the case may be, under which the court martial against which the appeal was filed had been held.

(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (3), any sentence passed on an appeal from the Tribunal to the Supreme Court in substitution for another sentence shall, unless the Supreme Court otherwise directs, be reckoned to commence on the day on which the original sentence would have commenced.

(3) Where a person who is undergoing sentence is granted stay of the operation of the said sentence, either by suspension or otherwise, pending an appeal, the period during which he is so released due to the sentence having been so stayed, shall be excluded in computing the term for which he is so sentenced by the Tribunal or the Supreme Court, as the case may be.

Section 24(1): Commencement of sentence passed by the Tribunal

Sub-section (1) applies where the Tribunal passes a sentence under Section 15(6)(a). Unless the Tribunal directs otherwise, the sentence is reckoned to commence on the date on which it would have commenced under the service law governing the court martial concerned.

The relevant service law may be the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950, depending on the force and the court-martial proceedings from which the appeal arose.

Section 24(2): Sentence substituted by the Supreme Court

Sub-section (2) deals with a sentence passed by the Supreme Court in substitution for another sentence on appeal from the Tribunal. Subject to sub-section (3), the substituted sentence is ordinarily reckoned from the date on which the original sentence would have commenced, unless the Supreme Court directs otherwise.

This rule prevents a substituted sentence from automatically acquiring a new commencement date merely because the sentence is altered on further appeal.

Section 24(3): Effect of stay or suspension pending appeal

Sub-section (3) applies where a person undergoing sentence is released because operation of the sentence has been stayed, whether by suspension or otherwise, pending an appeal. The period during which the person remains released because of that stay is excluded while computing the term of the sentence.

Practical effect: a stay of operation of the sentence pending appeal may stop the relevant period from counting toward completion of the sentence where the person is released because of that stay.

Meaning of "term of sentence" under Section 24

In the context of Section 24, the "term of sentence" refers to the period for which the sentence imposed by the Tribunal or the Supreme Court is to run. The provision determines when that period begins and what period, if any, must be left out of the calculation because operation of the sentence was stayed pending appeal.

Relationship between Sections 15 and 24

Section 15 confers appellate jurisdiction on the Armed Forces Tribunal in matters arising from court martial. Section 24 does not itself create the appellate power to alter a sentence. Instead, it regulates the commencement and computation of a sentence once a sentence has been passed by the Tribunal under the appellate framework or substituted by the Supreme Court.

Related provisions under the AFT Act

Official legal references

India Code - Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007: Official Act page on India Code

Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench: AFT Act and Rules

Related reading

Also read Section 23 - Procedure and powers of the Tribunal, Section 25 - Right to legal assistance and appointment of counsel and Section 30 - Appeal to Supreme Court.