Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Section 81: Admissibility of Evidence in Other Proceedings

Section 81 protects the confidentiality and settlement-oriented character of conciliation by restricting parties from relying on specified conciliation communications in later arbitral or judicial proceedings.

Text of Section 81

81. Admissibility of evidence in other proceedings.

The parties shall not rely on or introduce as evidence in arbitral or judicial proceedings, whether or not such proceedings relate to the dispute that is the subject of the conciliation proceedings:

  1. views expressed or suggestions made by the other party in respect of a possible settlement of the dispute;
  2. admissions made by the other party in the course of the conciliation proceedings;
  3. proposals made by the conciliator; and
  4. the fact that the other party had indicated willingness to accept a proposal for settlement made by the conciliator.

The official text of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is available through India Code.

Meaning and Scope of Section 81

Section 81 is an evidentiary protection applicable to conciliation under Part III of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Its purpose is to allow parties to explore settlement without the ordinary risk that concessions, proposals or settlement positions will later be used against them.

The restriction is broad. It applies to both arbitral proceedings and judicial proceedings, and it applies whether or not the later proceeding concerns the same dispute that was the subject of conciliation.

What Material Cannot Be Relied On or Introduced as Evidence?

1. Settlement views or suggestions

A party cannot rely on views expressed or suggestions made by the other party regarding a possible settlement. This encourages open settlement discussions without converting negotiation positions into later evidence.

2. Admissions during conciliation

Admissions made by the other party during conciliation are protected from being introduced as evidence under Section 81. The protection is tied to admissions made in the course of the conciliation proceedings.

3. Proposals made by the conciliator

A conciliator may make proposals to assist the parties in reaching settlement. Section 81 prevents a party from later relying on those proposals as evidence in arbitral or judicial proceedings.

4. Willingness to accept a settlement proposal

A party also cannot rely on the fact that the other party indicated willingness to accept a settlement proposal made by the conciliator.

Relationship with Confidentiality in Conciliation

Section 81 works with the wider confidentiality framework in Part III. In particular, Section 75 addresses confidentiality of matters relating to conciliation proceedings, while Section 80 restricts the conciliator from acting in specified roles in later proceedings unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

Section 81 is more specific: it directly identifies categories of conciliation material that parties cannot rely upon or introduce as evidence.

Mediation Act, 2023: Current Legal Position

The Mediation Act, 2023 contains amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in its Sixth Schedule. Those amendments contemplate substitution of Sections 61 to 81 and include a saving provision for earlier conciliation proceedings.

However, commencement of the Mediation Act is provision-specific. The official commencement note presently available on India Code records that specified provisions came into force on 9 October 2023 and does not list Section 61 of the Mediation Act, which is the provision that gives effect to the Sixth Schedule amendment of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Accordingly, Section 81 continues to appear in the current India Code presentation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Readers should verify any later commencement notification before relying on this position for a live dispute.

Official resources: Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Mediation Act, 2023.

Practical Effect

Parties participating in conciliation should distinguish between evidence that exists independently of the conciliation and settlement communications generated in the conciliation process. Section 81 specifically protects the settlement-related categories listed in the provision. It should not be treated as a general rule making every underlying document or fact inadmissible merely because it was discussed during conciliation.

Legal status reviewed against official India Code materials in September 2026.