Section 436 BNSS: Reference to High Court

Section 436 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) governs the reference of specified legal questions by criminal courts to the High Court. It appears in Chapter XXXII, titled "Reference and Revision".

Updated: 12 September 2026

Current legal position: The BNSS is in force from 1 July 2024, subject to the statutory savings provision in Section 531 for proceedings that were already pending immediately before commencement. Section 436 is the present BNSS provision dealing with reference to the High Court.

Text of Section 436 BNSS

436. Reference to High Court.—(1) Where any Court is satisfied that a case pending before it involves a question as to the validity of any Act, Ordinance or Regulation or of any provision contained in an Act, Ordinance or Regulation, the determination of which is necessary for the disposal of the case, and is of opinion that such Act, Ordinance, Regulation or provision is invalid or inoperative, but has not been so declared by the High Court to which that Court is subordinate or by the Supreme Court, the Court shall state a case setting out its opinion and the reasons therefor, and refer the same for the decision of the High Court.

Explanation.—In this section, "Regulation" means any Regulation as defined in the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897), or in the General Clauses Act of a State.

(2) A Court of Session may, if it thinks fit in any case pending before it to which the provisions of sub-section (1) do not apply, refer for the decision of the High Court any question of law arising in the hearing of such case.

(3) Any Court making a reference to the High Court under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) may, pending the decision of the High Court thereon, either commit the accused to jail or release him on bail to appear when called upon.

Meaning and scope of Section 436

Section 436 creates two distinct routes for a reference to the High Court. The first route, under sub-section (1), applies when the validity or operability of legislation is directly in issue and the referring court considers the provision invalid or inoperative. The second route, under sub-section (2), is narrower as to the referring court: it permits a Court of Session to refer another question of law arising during the hearing of a pending case.

1. Mandatory reference under Section 436(1)

A reference under sub-section (1) becomes obligatory where the statutory conditions are satisfied. In practical terms, the following requirements must coexist:

2. Discretionary reference by a Court of Session under Section 436(2)

Where sub-section (1) does not apply, a Court of Session may refer to the High Court a question of law arising in the hearing of a pending case. The word "may" makes this a discretionary reference. The provision does not confer the same power under sub-section (2) on every criminal court.

Important 2025 Delhi High Court clarification: In Court on its Own Motion v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi, decided on 8 December 2025, the Delhi High Court held that a Magistrate cannot use Section 436(2) to refer an ordinary question of law to the High Court. The Court noted that, unlike former Section 395(2) CrPC, Section 436(2) BNSS confines this power to a Court of Session.

3. Custody or bail while reference is pending

Under Section 436(3), the referring court may, while awaiting the High Court's decision, either commit the accused to jail or release the accused on bail to appear when called upon. The provision therefore preserves the referring court's control over the accused during the pendency of the reference.

Section 436 BNSS and former Section 395 CrPC

Point BNSS Section 436 Former CrPC Section 395
Subject Reference to High Court Reference to High Court
Validity question under sub-section (1) Substantially retained Substantially similar framework
Other questions of law under sub-section (2) Court of Session Court of Session or Metropolitan Magistrate
Pending reference Accused may be committed to jail or released on bail Comparable power existed

The deletion of the reference to a Metropolitan Magistrate in sub-section (2) is a material textual change. For legacy proceedings, however, the applicable procedural code must be checked in light of Section 531 BNSS, which preserves the CrPC framework for specified proceedings already pending immediately before 1 July 2024.

Practical procedure for a reference

Key distinction: Section 436 is not a substitute for appeal or revision. A reference is a statutory mechanism through which a subordinate criminal court places a qualifying legal question before the High Court in the circumstances specified by the section.

Section 436 opens Chapter XXXII of the BNSS. It should be read with Section 437 - Disposal of case according to decision of High Court and the succeeding revision provisions beginning with Section 438 - Calling for records to exercise powers of revision.

Official legal sources

Frequently asked questions

What is Section 436 BNSS?

It is the BNSS provision governing references by criminal courts to the High Court in the circumstances stated in its three sub-sections.

When is a reference under Section 436(1) mandatory?

It is mandatory when the statutory conditions in sub-section (1) are satisfied, including the court's opinion that a relevant Act, Ordinance, Regulation or provision is invalid or inoperative and that the question is necessary for disposal of the pending case.

Can a Magistrate refer any question of law under Section 436(2)?

No. The text of Section 436(2) gives that discretionary power to a Court of Session. The Delhi High Court has expressly noticed this change from former Section 395(2) CrPC.

Can the accused get bail while the reference is pending?

Yes. Section 436(3) permits the referring court to release the accused on bail to appear when called upon, or alternatively to commit the accused to jail.

What provision applies after the High Court decides the reference?

Section 437 BNSS governs disposal after the High Court's decision and requires the referring court to dispose of the case in conformity with that decision.