Home  >  Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023  >  Section 33

Section 33 BSA 2023: Evidence When a Statement Forms Part of a Conversation, Document or Electronic Record

Section 33 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 ("BSA") deals with how much of a larger statement, conversation, document, electronic record, book, or connected series of letters or papers should be placed in evidence when only a part is relied upon.

Meaning and purpose of Section 33

Section 33 prevents a statement from being understood in isolation when its proper meaning depends on surrounding material. If a party relies on only one part of a conversation, document, electronic record, book, or connected correspondence, the Court may require enough of the surrounding material to understand the statement fairly and accurately.

The section does not require the whole record to be proved in every case. Its language is deliberately limited to "so much and no more" as the Court considers necessary for a full understanding of the statement, its effect, and the circumstances in which it was made.

What kinds of material are covered?

• A statement forming part of a longer statement.
• A statement forming part of a conversation.
• A statement forming part of an isolated document.
• A document forming part of a book.
• A statement contained in part of an electronic record.
• A statement forming part of a connected series of letters or papers.

How the Court applies Section 33

The controlling test is necessity in the circumstances of the particular case. The Court determines how much additional context is required to understand the nature and effect of the statement. The provision therefore gives the Court a case-specific role in preventing selective extracts from creating a misleading or incomplete impression.

Example

If one message from a longer electronic conversation is relied upon, the Court may consider surrounding messages to the extent necessary to understand what the relied-upon message actually meant, how it arose, and the circumstances in which it was made. Section 33 does not automatically make every message in the entire conversation necessary or relevant.

Electronic records under Section 33

Section 33 expressly refers to an "electronic record." This makes the rule directly relevant to modern forms of communication such as emails, digital messages, electronic documents, and other records stored or transmitted electronically, subject to the other applicable provisions of the BSA governing relevancy, proof, and admissibility.

Section 33 BSA and former Section 39 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Key points for practical use

• Do not read an isolated extract without considering context where context is necessary to understand its meaning or effect.
• The Court decides how much additional material is necessary in the particular case.
• The section is not a rule requiring production of every part of a larger record.
• The provision expressly covers electronic records as well as traditional documents and correspondence.
• Questions of relevancy, admissibility, authenticity, and proof remain subject to the other applicable provisions of the BSA.