99. When the facts are such that the language used might have been meant to apply to any one, and could not have been meant to apply to more than one, of several persons or things, evidence may be given of facts which show which of those persons or things it was intended to apply to.
Illustrations.
(a) A agrees to sell to B, for one thousand rupees, "my white horse". A has
two white horses. Evidence may be given of facts which show which of them
was meant.
(b) A agrees to accompany B to Ramgarh. Evidence may be given of facts showing whether Ramgarh in Rajasthan or Ramgarh in Uttarakhand was meant.
Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Section 91 Presumption as to due execution, etc., of documents not produced
Section 92 Presumption as to documents thirty years old
Section 93 Presumption as to electronic records five years old
Section 95 Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement
Section 96 Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document
Section 97 Exclusion of evidence against application of document to existing facts
Section 98 Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts
Section 99 Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons