15-6-2024
The Delhi High Court passed the ex parte interim order after observing that Congress leaders had over-sensationalised the incident and that there appeared to be a false depiction of facts.
The Delhi High Court has ordered a takedown of social media posts
and videos by Congress party leaders Ragini Nayak, Jairam Ramesh and
Pawan Khera alleging that journalist Rajat Sharma abused and used
foul language against Nayak on live television.
In an ex parte interim order passed on Friday, Justice Neena Bansal
Krishna said that the Congress leaders had over-sensationalised the
incident and there was a false depiction of facts.
The Court held that irreparable loss would be caused to Sharma if
the content is allowed to remain on social media platforms.
"The X posts (Twitter posts) berating the plaintiff (Sharma) are
nothing but an over-sensationalization and depiction of facts which
are patently false. Prima facie dissemination of such X Posts has
not only caused harm to the reputation of the plaintiff as has been
asserted by him, but also has the potential of persistent threat of
being used against the plaintiff at any time in future. Such being
the imminent threat of misuse of the videos in future, which are
prima facie depicting plaintiff in a light which may not be based on
true facts, is liable to be restrained from being kept in the public
domain till the Suit is finally decided," the Court ordered.
Justice Krishna said that making these videos private or injuncting
the Congress leaders from making these videos available on the
public platforms would not, in any way, infringe on their right of
freedom of speech and expression.
"However, the inconvenience that would result from these videos and
X posts/Tweets etc, continuing to remain in public domain, has the
potential to cause an inconvenience which may not be possible to be
reparated or compensated by damages or otherwise, in future," the
Bench said.
It, therefore, ordered,
"From the aforesaid discussion, it is directed that the X
Posts/Tweets (URLs annexed as 'Annexure-1') which have not been
removed, be removed within seven days by defendants in terms of the
Intermediary Guidelines. It is further directed that the videos
which are in the public domain be made private by defendant No.2 and
not to be put in the public domain, without the Orders of this
Court."
The posts have to be removed within a week.
The Court also issued summons to Congress leaders on Sharma's suit
and listed the case for further hearing on July 11.
Sharma has sued Nayak, Khera and Ramesh for defamation and sought
₹100 crore in damages.
Several social media handles had posted a video clip of a discussion
on India TV (the news channel owned by Sharma) on the day of the Lok
Sabha election results claiming that Sharma used foul language
against Congress spokesperson Ragini Nayak.
On June 10, Nayak posted the video on X and said that in the video,
Sharma can be heard using foul language against her. She then filed
a police complaint against Sharma as well.
Later, on June 11, Sharma said that the Congress party's media cell
ran a false campaign claiming that he used foul language and that
this was a conspiracy.
He said that India TV gave a warning to Congress' communication
department stating that if they keep on spreading falsehoods, it
would amount to defamation.
"Congress spokesperson was sent with the intention to provoke me,"
Sharma said on the June 11 broadcast.
He added that despite this warning, the Congress media cell
continued making allegations against him and that this was why he
has taken legal action.
Sharma's counsel then posted a statement on India TV's official X
handle and warned Nayak as well as Congress leaders, Jairam Ramesh
and Pawan Khera against making defamatory allegations.
"We have seen your posts on social media where you have accused Mr.
Sharma of using abusive language on air. The allegations made by you
in your posts are absolutely false and lack any basis and foundation
whatsoever. They are malicious and defamatory and clearly constitute
fake news. You have blatantly violated all limits of public decency
by falsely accusing a personality of high repute. We are taking
legal advice on this to take further action," Sharma's counsel said
in a statement posted on India TV's X handle.
Senior Advocate Maninder Singh briefed by Sudeep Chatterjee, Rohan
Swarup, Kunal Vats and Sanyam Suri of Singh & Singh Law Firm
appeared for Rajat Sharma.
MP High Court dismissed petition challenging appointment of 7 High Court judges filed by a Lawyer
Over charging tourist by taxi operators Jammu and Kashmir High Court slams UT admin over inaction
Irregular interfaith marriage Kerala High Court upholds conviction of man under Section 498A of IPC
Animal Sacrifice on Bakrid Bombay High Court allowed annual Urs at Vishalgad Dargah
Remove video of Arvind Kejriwal addressing court, from social Media platforms, Delhi High Court